WebSupreme Court of India Judgement Cited In 1950 AIR (SC) 124, 1950 (56) CRLJ 1514, 1950 SCJ 418, 1950 (1) SCR 594 LawyerServices, Founder: Parikshit A Advani. LawyerServices. HOME; ECOSYSTEM; DELIVERY; ... Romesh Thappar v/s State of Madras ORIGINAL JURISDICTION: Petition No. XVI of 1950 Decided On, 26 May 1950. At, Supreme Court of … WebOct 20, 2024 · Shri K. Rajah Ayyar, Advocate General of Madras, (Shri Ganpathi Ayyar, Advocate, Supreme Court, with him) instructed by Shri P. A. Mehta, Agent -for Opposite Party. Judgment. Fazl Ali, J— For the reasons given by me in Brij Bhushan vs. The State of Delhi, AIR 1950 SC 129, which practically involves the same question as is involved in this ...
Brij Bhushan And Anr. vs The State Of Delhi on 2 March, 1950
WebA K Gopalan vs State of Madras - Preventive Detention Act 1950. Romesh Thappar vs State of Madras - Freedom of Speech - Post publication prevention of circulation of crossroad weekly magazine resulted in violation of freedom of speech [This judgment resulted into amendment in Article 19 of Indian Constitution] WebRomesh Thappar v. State Of Madras. Patanjali Sastri, J.—. The petitioner is the printer, publisher and editor of a recently started weekly journal in English called Cross Roads … mern crash course
Freedom of Speech and Expression: Case Analysis- Romesh …
WebRomesh Thappar v. The State ([1950] S.C.R. 594) followed. Per FAZL ALI J.-- The expression "public safety" has, as a result of a long course of legislative practice acquired a well-recognised meaning and may be taken to denote safety or security of the State; and, though the expression "public WebJun 22, 2024 · It is submitted that the case of ‘ Romesh Thappar v. State of Madras [18]’ AIR 1950 SC 124 is a healthy precedent in the field of freedom of press. In a democratic … WebFeb 16, 2024 · Romesh Thappar v. State of Madras (1950) The SC held that freedom of propagating ideas through circulars is included in freedom of speech and expression. State of Madras v. Amt. Champakam Dorairajan (1951) The judgment led to the addition of this subsection (4) by the First Constitutional Amendment Act, 1951. how rare is the minakaze drop